The Sun from the sun2surf; THE Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) proposal to make itself more independent by establishing a commission will go a long way towards improving its image, which has taken a battering of late. The fallacy that the agency acts without fear or favour is further compounded by the recent admission of former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad that he has called up ACA officers to question them on a case they were investigating. However, one hopes that the proposal by the ACA for a commission to investigate corruption – modelled after Hongkong’s very successful Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) will not be another cosmetic exercise in the same image as Suhakam – the Malaysian Human Rights Commission that has proven to be a toothless tiger, whose annual report is not even tabled in Parliament. One reason for this is that after all the hard work the ACA puts in to investigate and make a case against an individual or individuals, whether the law will take its course hinges solely on the Attorney-General’s discretion. Public confidence in the system has waned due to this discretion, which the people perceive is often used against those abused, and in favour of those protected, by the system. Thus, one cannot fault the public’s lack of enthusiasm for the proposal, which to all intents and purposes is a good suggestion, as a commission against corruption would make the agency answerable to the people via Parliament. Which is why, it is imperative that those tasked with ensuring the commission’s independence and effectiveness must be sincere in wanting to rehabilitate the image of the ACA – an agency that in itself has been rocked by allegations of corruption and abuse of power by its former head. Firstly, the commission must comprise respected individuals from various strata of government, society and civil groups – be it former policemen, judges and members of organisations which champion transparency – to imbue checks-and-balances and reduce the likelihood of interference from third parties. Secondly, the decision to proceed or not with prosecution must not be vested solely on one individual. A mechanism must be in place where the Attorney-General should be made answerable for his decision – making him, too, accountable to the people. Thirdly, the commission must give detailed reasons as to why a case has been dropped. The present attitude of "we don’t need to explain or inform" does not help instil public confidence in the ACA. Fourthly, there must be adequate protection for whistle-blowers. Previously, those who lodged reports were treated as suspects. One hopes that finally, there is political will to ensure a competent, effective and transparent system to fight graft. |
Monday, April 21, 2008
A truly independent ACA
Saturday, April 19, 2008
60 tahun bersara - Ah lamanya menunggu !
PTK - Pencen Tak Kemana ??
CUEPACS tidak peduli kesan lanjut umur persaraan
Oleh AZMAN ANUAR
(WARTAWAN UTUSAN)
MAJORITI kakitangan kerajaan sekarang boleh tersenyum lebar apabila lima daripada enam 'tuntutan' Kongres Kesatuan Pekerja-Pekerja Dalam Perkhidmatan Awam (CUEPACS) akhirnya dipersetujui oleh Perdana Menteri.
Kelmarin dengan wajah ceria, Presiden CUEPACS, Omar Osman mengumumkan secara ringkas lima perkara yang diterima itu. Pemimpin CUEPACS nampaknya tidak peduli suasana sosioekonomi dan politik negara. Barangkali jika tuntutan tidak dipersetujui oleh Perdana Menteri, Khamis lalu, mungkin cadangan mereka memboikot majlis sambutan Hari Pekerja akan diteruskan. Walaupun kerajaan tidak bersetuju pemberian honorarium RM2,000 tetapi secara jelas kakitangan awam telah berjaya mendapat tambahan pendapatan daripada kadar pencen, lanjutan umur persaraan, elaun kritikal dan penambahan elaun perumahan. Pemansuhan peperiksaan Penilaian Tahap Kecekapan (PTK) dilihat usaha memotong 'tali ikatan' di badan kakitangan awam daripada peraturan ketat penilaian prestasi. Hakikat sekarang, kerajaan telah membuat persetujuan dengan CUEPACS yang dikatakan mewakili 1.2 juta kakitangan awam negara ini. Namun, perkara berkaitan lanjutan umur persaraan perlu dikaji secara teliti terutama mengambil kira pelbagai implikasinya. Melanjutkan usia persaraan kepada usia 60 tahun adalah tidak wajar untuk semua sektor kerajaan. Dalam tempoh sekarang, cadangan ini perlu dikaji dengan semasak-masak agar keputusan itu tidak memudaratkan kerajaan sendiri. Walaupun terdapat penjimatan bayaran pencen dan penangguhan imbuhan persaraan, tetapi kerajaan sebenarnya terpaksa membayar lebih berikutan lanjutan umur secara pukul rata itu. Sebab itu kerajaan tidak patut terikat untuk memberikan lanjutan umur persaraan secara pukul rata kepada semua kakitangan kerana ia tidak membantu meningkatkan kecekapan atau produktiviti sektor awam. Selain itu, kerajaan perlu memikirkan kakitangan yang sudah berumur 56 tahun mungkin tidak dapat menunjukkan mutu perkhidmatan yang baik kerana ditimpa pelbagai penyakit dan lemah keupayaan fizikal dan minda. Jika kerajaan bersetuju melanjutkan usia persaraan sama ada 57, 58, 59 atau 60 tahun sekalipun, ketika itu kerajaan tidak dapat memberhentikan kakitangan berkenaan sesuka hati kerana peraturan dan pelbagai alasan dicari untuk tidak membenarkannya.
Pada hemat penulis, apabila tiba masanya bagi seseorang itu bersara maka dia patutlah bersara. Melanjutkan had umur persaraan itu perlu dihalusi dan dikaji sebaik-baik mungkin dan bukan boleh dibuat main-main. Banyak aspek mengenai keperluan terutama dari segi perjawatan perlu diambil kira jika ia dilaksanakan. Kerajaan kena melihat keperluan semasa. Modal insan lepasan persekolahan dan institusi pengajian tinggi pun hendak bekerja di sektor awam. Apakah jawatan itu hendak terus dipegang orang lama saja?
Kecuali kalau individu itu memiliki kehebatan dari segi mental dan fizikal serta prestasi kerja atau keupayaan menunaikan tanggungjawab dengan sempurna. Sebab itu, adalah wajar diteruskan amalan melanjutkan tempoh perkhidmatan kepada pegawai yang sudah melepasi had umur persaraan berdasarkan kontrak sahaja. Pun begitu, 'anugerah' ini dihadkan kepada mereka yang benar-benar memiliki keistimewaan dan kebolehan menyampaikan tanggungjawab dengan baik sahaja. Perjuangan melanjutkan usia persaraan kakitangan awam bukan isu baru diperjuangkan oleh CUEPACS. Alasan utama pemimpin CUEPACS adalah bagi menyelesaikan masalah kegagalan pesara merancang simpanan untuk kegunaan hari tua. Tetapi, jika dibandingkan dengan pesara swasta, pesara sektor awam lebih baik kerana mendapat wang pencen bulanan secara tetap. Sepatutnya jika mereka yang berusia 56 tahun ingin terus bekerja kerana masalah kewangan, carilah pekerjaan lain bagi menampung keperluan keluarga. Bukan menumpang hasil cukai wang rakyat. Harus diingat bahawa banyak implikasi jika persetujuan melanjut umur persaraan 60 tahun diterima oleh kerajaan. Paling utama, ia menutup peluang orang ramai untuk mendapat ribuan kerja setiap tahun di sektor kerajaan, sekali gus meningkatkan kadar pengangguran. Kerajaan harus sedar bahawa isu pengangguran ini bukanlah satu isu yang remeh. Modal insan generasi muda tidak patut dipersia-siakan untuk dilatih menjadi barisan pemimpin pelapis kerajaan. Kita percaya, bukan menjadi hasrat kerajaan untuk membenarkan pegawai tidak produktif terus berkhidmat sehingga berumur 60 tahun. Tetapi jika cadangan memanjangkan umur bersara dilaksanakan, adalah tidak mustahil jika pegawai yang tidak produktif juga ingin terus berkhidmat di atas alasan perlu menyara hidup yang tinggi. Kerajaan belum terlewat untuk melihat rasional lanjut tempoh umur persaraan itu.
Thursday, April 17, 2008
PTK - Prihatin Teras Kejayaan
Kerajaan tolak pemberian honorarium
Government should stop pampering public employees
The union has been trying to get the Government to agree to a RM2,000 special payment to help ease the financial burden of its 1.2 million members. In addition, it has called for the retirement age to be extended, to have a fairer way of promoting workers, and to increase the cost of living allowance. On its own, the RM2,000 honorarium may seem reasonable, especially since civil servants had been given a year-end bonus before. However, in view of the 30% or more in wage increases recently, this new request may seem a bit too much not only for the Government but also the public. The recent pay rise had resulted in civil servants being better paid than those in the private sector. Every one is affected by the higher cost of living, not only government employees. The union seems to think that the Government has unlimited funds to pander to its every financial wish. It can calculate how much the new special payment will cost.
Perhaps it may feel that civil servants deserve the payment, but the public will definitely think otherwise. What irks people is that despite the pay increase, there has not been much improvement in the delivery of service. Why should anyone be paid more when there is little improvement in performance or productivity? And before the dust has settled, there is the demand for a special bonus. The union cannot expect to keep on asking for perks without giving back something in return. The public is getting tired of this attitude and will not want the Government to keep pampering its civil servants. In actual fact, civil servants, particularly those in local councils, could have been one of the contributing factors to the Barisan Nasional’s recent electoral setback.
Officials of city halls, municipal councils and local councils have consistently ignored the wishes and aspirations of the people. In fact, residents have been extremely unhappy at the lack of basic services. Despite a series of complaints, officials have often simply turned a deaf ear to the ratepayers and continued to do as they please in carrying out their duties. It is this attitude that has annoyed and frustrated the public to such an extent that they vented their anger at Barisan candidates in the 2008 general election. The newly formed Pakatan governments in Kedah, Penang, Perak and Selangor will face the same problem encountered by the Barisan in dealing with such officials. Civil servants are supposed to serve the party in power but they often only pay lip service to this undertaking. They only look after their own interests since governments come and go. They are the only ones who will remain permanent and they know it is not easy to sack them. With 1.2 million of them, how many can the ruling party get rid of without serious administrative and political repercussions?
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
PTK - Pasti Terus Kehadapan
Delivery system Aim for excellence in service
A bribe is still a bribe
KOTA BARU: The amount may be small but a bribe is still a bribe.
That was what Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) Deputy Director-General Datuk Zakaria Jaffar emphasised when he revealed that the lowest bribe amount the agency investigated in Kelantan was RM9, in 2004.
“The measure of culpability is not in the amount ... the amount may be small, but it’s still an offence under the Anti-Corruption Act 1997 ... for giving a bribe,” he told reporters here. Earlier, he attended the handing over of duties by state ACA director Md Yusof Md Zain, who will assume the post of Johor ACA director, to Mohd Jaafar Hussin.
Zakaria said the highest bribe amount the agency investigated in Kelantan in the last five years was RM1,500. He also said that during that period the Kelantan ACA received 1,931 tip-offs and investigation papers were opened on 218 cases.
“A total of 60 people were arrested and charged with corruption in those five years.” – Bernama
Monday, April 14, 2008
Neither giver nor taker be
WHEN the present administration first took office pledging to combat corruption, and when protesters took to the streets three years later to denounce the perceived lack of progress in that regard, it's doubtful that either context encompassed the door gifts, goodie bags and letter-openers routinely presented to guests of honour gracing events with their presence to do the ribbon-cutting, gong-banging and plaque-signing honours. This makes it almost charming that the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) should spend so much thought on drafting guidelines on gifts to public servants.
Leave politics to politicians, civil servants told
PUTRAJAYA: Civil servants should “let politics be handled by politicians” and concentrate on carrying out their administrative duties and responsibilities.
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said he did not want to hear complaints, particularly about staff at the Finance Ministry, that a project could not go on as planned because the matter was “stuck at the Treasury.” “The Treasury should not act as a hindrance to the implementation of projects under the Ninth Malaysia Plan. In the last four years, we have planned many projects but there was not enough implementation. The mid-term review is currently going on. “So, within these last few years under the 9MP, we have to further enhance our implementation. The Treasury is the main agency involved because many other ministries refer to it for vital decisions. “I don’t want these projects to get stuck at the Treasury and for it to become the cause of delay,” he said in his speech at the ministry’s monthly assembly here Monday. Abdullah, who is also the First Finance Minister, urged the ministry staff to continue re-training themselves and told them that they should not think of human capital development as only relevant to those entering universities.
By SIM LEOI LEOI The Star Online
Sunday, April 13, 2008
Change mindset on blogging
THE negative perception about bloggers and blogging should be changed, said Centre for Policy Initiatives chief executive officer Dr Lim Teck Ghee. Dr Lim said blogging could be seen as an alternative media to the masses. “It provides a platform for public discourse irrespective of their background. The notion that bloggers mainly have negative intentions including bringing down the government and destroying the country's racial harmony is an erroneous view and politically motivated,” he said. He added that most bloggers were concerned about the nation. “Having a healthy public discourse will help unify the nation and build the country as well,” he added.Therefore, the Centre for Policy Initiatives is organising a half-day public discourse at Lake View Club, Subang Jaya, on May 1.
By SALINA KHALID; The STAR Online
Wednesday, April 9, 2008
Governmental reform and reengineering aimed at regaining public confidence
The government is determined to carry out reforms and reengineering in its political, administrative and policy aspects to regain public confidence following last month's general election, said Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak today.
The Deputy Prime Minister said the government has the political will and commitment to undertake the reforms after receiving the general election results in an open manner.“The people’s voice is of utmost importance and determines everything in the system of parliamentary democracy,” he said at the Monthly Assembly of the Prime Minister’s Department here.He said the government is determined to carry out soul-searching and listen to the voice of the people and it is not merely paying lip-service but is responding to the people’s voice in a sincere and bold manner.“Our reform has not gone far enough compared to the people’s aspirations,” he said.
Najib said the people are now more educated and becoming more concerned about developments in the country and thus, whatever promises made by the government must be fulfilled.The government is committed in providing service to the people without marginalising any group, he said.He wants the civil servants to understand the people’s “psyche” because they did not show their feelings through demonstrations but through the general election.The Deputy Prime Minister said more “people-centric projects” will be implemented including providing houses and the `Hardcore Poor Housing Programmes”. “The government will ensure that its efforts will provide prosperity to the people,” he said.Najib said the government is aware that the opposition were using the “populist approach” while the government adopted the “correct approach” and “prudence approach” in the country’s financial management.“We have to convince the people that our approach is the best for the country’s future,” he said.In implementing the reforms and reengineering, the government must look into the woes of the people who felt that the country’s economy was not growing although the economic growth was between 5.5 and six per cent.“Similarly, we succeeded in bringing down the poverty rate significantly but on the ground, the situation was not commensurate or in tangent with the rate.Very soon, he said, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi wanted reforms in the judiciary to be implemented so that the people would have greater confidence in the country’s judicial system.Najib said the government is hoping for the cooperation of all members of the civil service in implementing the reforms.
Sunday, April 6, 2008
Seni Perang - The Art of War
Strategic Plan - About Mission
Friday, April 4, 2008
Strategic Plan - About Vision
Sharing BPM - Strategy "Quote and Riddle"
- satisfy the customer
- Stake out a position both locally and internationally
- Conduct operations
- Complete successfully
- Achieve organisational objective and mandate.
Thursday, April 3, 2008
Civil service must respond to conventional and alternative media, says Sidek Hassan
The civil service has to respond not only to the conventional but also the alternative media to deliver services more efficiently, Chief Secretary to the Government Tan Sri Mohd Sidek Hassan said today. “Gone are the days when public officials could choose to ignore the media, complaints, telephone rings or even letters to editors,” he said during a luncheon talk titled “Challenges of Malaysian Business Competitiveness in the Global Economy”. He said the notion that the alternative media was associated with “young punks” no longer holds true as it now knows no age limit. Sidek said the speed of information is such that countries and companies of today needed web-based crisis management plans to address effects of negative blogging in times of crisis. “Even the prime minister himself has initiated a website for the public to write in directly to him on any issues. If the prime minister is taking and making all efforts to engage the public individually and directly, surely this clearly sets the standard of service for the public and private sectors,” he said.
fr The NST Online.
Current number of active bloggers in Malaysia
MALAYSIA has about 500,000 active bloggers, ranking the country among the highest in the world after Indonesia and the European Union,Utusan Malaysia reported. According to Universiti Malaya media department lecturer, Dr Abu Hassan Hasbullah, this showed the power of blogs in influencing the thinking of the people, especially about politics. He said blogs currently had a wide reach considering how many Internet users visited these sites everyday. “Our research shows that 70% of the election results were influenced by information in the blogs,” he said. Dr Abu Hassan said the ruling government could use blogs but pointed out that it would take a long time for it to be popular.
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
Civil service role: Serve government of the day
All too often teachers are taken away from their classrooms to attend functions that are not relevant to their duties. Such valuable time could be better spent in the classroom with their students. However, the decision to grant such an option to teachers because the state is no longer under Barisan Nasional rule lacks professionalism and understanding of our democratic system. It is important to remember that teachers, as civil servants, serve the public and the government. The government is elected by the people. Therefore, civil servants must respect and take orders that are legitimate from state government officials regardless of the political party that forms it.
Civil servants themselves should be non-partisan. After being subjected to 50 years of rule by a single party it may be difficult to accept a sudden change in the administration, and the emergence of "Little Napoleons", who are reluctant to adopt changes, will be inevitable. The new administration should be patient and try to win over the trust and confidence of civil servants before embarking on radical changes, especially controversial ones. The changes they undertake should be seen to benefit the people in general and not as a means to run down the previous administration. If done with care and caution, it would be possible to change the mindset of the civil servants and develop a clear partition between a political party and the government. The people have spoken and the verdict must be accepted by all, including civil servants. They must change to adapt to working with the new government which is elected by the people. Politicians come and go but the government with its various ministries and departments should remain non-partisan, committed to serve in accordance with the laws of the state, irrespective of which party rules it. In the final analysis, the system that is in place should benefit not the party or the government but the people who are the real masters.